A similar study, by the Zimbabwe Institute46, made similar points in respect of the way in which MDC members of parliament have
been treated by the Mugabe regime, practices which even drew the condemnation of the International Parliamentary Union47, and
which continue today. This brief reference to POSA is made in order to highlight a changed tactic of in the repression, and a move
away from blunt violence to intimidation, most probably in response to the enormous criticism that the regime was experiencing from
the exposure of the violations. However, it is apparent that there was a strong return to the use of blunt violence in 2007 and 2008,
with reports of abductions, assaults, murder, and torture all increasing.
Torture shows a steady decline from the peak of 2000, but shows an increase from 2005. There are very dramatic increases in
unlawful arrests and detentions, and most dramatically from 2005. There is a large increase in displacements in 2005, presumably all
associated with Operation Murambatsvina, but then a subsequent decline, whilst interference with basic freedoms shows a steady
increase from 2004 onwards.
It is pertinent here to point out that there have been frequent references to the relationship between elections and gross human
rights violations, but infrequent analysis that could establish whether this was a deliberate tactic in respect of elections48. A quick
analysis of the Human Rights Forum’s data with reference to elections confirms the view that gross human rights violations are more
common during elections than at other times. Such violations are also more common at times when the state is threatened by public
dissent, such as during strikes, stay aways, and protests. As can be seen from Table 11, there are significant relationships between the
frequency of some types of violation and elections.
The Human Rights Forum data was then categorized into months in which there were elections, and months in which these did not
occur. This gave 22 months in which “elections” had occurred, with a total number of 15,530 violations reported, and 67 months
in which 24,467 violations were reported. The difference between “election” and “non-election” months was strongly statistically
significant: this is not a mere trend, but rather a clear and empirically verified pattern of violations. As can be seen from Table 3,
torture, political discrimination, death threats, interference with basic freedoms, property violations, assaults, and abductions are all
significantly more frequent during “election” months, and the average number of violations during election months is nearly double
that reported in other months. It seems fair to conclude that this represents a deliberate strategy, and, if not, certainly not a situation
that the Zimbabwe Government has avoided, and rather mostly condoned.
TABLE 3
Comparison of “Election” and “Non-election” months, July 2001 to December 2008.
Source: Reports of the Human Rights Forum.
ELECTION
NO ELECTION
Abductions
344*
259
Arrest & detention
2137*
7402
Assault
2454*
2216
Attempted murder
18*
14
Death threats
136*
65
Disappearance
5
28
Displacement
846
861
Interference with basic freedoms
2805
7749
Murder
131*
77
Political discrimination
3101*
2964
Property violation
1028*
879
Rape
15*
12
School closure
27*
6
Torture
2483*
1935
Total
15530*
24467
Monthly average:
705.9
365.2
*statistically significant at p=0.01 or greater
46
47
48
See Zimbabwe Institute (2004), “Playing with fire”. Personal accounts of human rights abuses experienced by 50 opposition Members of Parliament in Zimbabwe, and
28 opposition election candidates. March 2004.
See IPU (2004), Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians: Report of its mission to Zimbabwe, 28 March - 2 April 2004. GENEVA: INTERNATIONAL
PARLIAMENTARY UNION.
See Reeler, A.P., & Chitsike, K.C (2005), Trick or Treat? The effects of the pre-election climate on the poll in the 2005 Zimbabwe Parliamentary Elections. June 2005.
PRETORIA: IDASA; NCA, The 2005 Parliamentary Election. Flawed, Unfree and Unfair! April 2005, NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL ASSEMBLY.
Page 13
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents