61 S.C. 128\02 (a) sections 8(1) and (2) and section 22(2) (b) section 8(5) (c) section 11(4) (d) section 12(1)(f)(2) and (3) (e) section 15 and 16 Costs normally follow the result. In the present case both parties were partially successful and the majority of the court has concluded that equity demands that there be no order as to costs. SANDURA JA: I have read the judgment prepared by CHIDYAUSIKU CJ and agree that sections 6, 9(1) and 9(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act [Chapter 12:06] (“the Act”) are inconsistent with s 20(1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (“the Constitution”). Secondly, I agree that it has not been shown that sections 4(2) and 4(3) of the Act contravene s 20(1) of the Constitution. Thirdly, I agree, but for a different reason, that the applicant does not have the locus standi in judicio to challenge the constitutionality of s 11(1) of the Act, as read with para 9(1)(b) and (c) of the Fifth Schedule to the Act. In my view, the only valid reason for the conclusion that the applicant does not have the requisite locus standi is that the conditions set out in para 9(1)(b) and (c) of the Fifth Schedule only apply to a commercial television broadcasting licence. They do not apply to a radio broadcasting licence which, according to the applicant’s founding affidavit, is the type