\ Global Youth Development Index and Report 2016
145
−6%
Medium
408
454
11%
High
15
1
−94%
Very high
26
41
58%
Very High 13
154
YDI levels in 2015
High 9
Low
YDI levels in 2010
Medium 15
Percen
tage
change
Low 12
Youth
population
in 2015
(millions)
High 12 Very High 9
Youth
population
in 2010
(millions)
Medium 13
YDI
level
Figure 2.7 The number of Commonwealth
countries at different YDI levels, 2010 and 2015
Low 15
Table 2.4 Commonwealth youth population by YDI
level, 2010 and 2015
Source: Commonwealth Secretariat
Figure 2.6 The number of countries worldwide at
the different YDI levels, 2010 and 2015
Medium 44
Low 39
High 44
Medium 45
High 48
Very High 56
YDI levels in 2015
Very High 46
YDI levels in 2010
Low 44
34
Source: Commonwealth Secretariat
high YDI categories have average scores that are in
line with those of others in these categories. Aside
from Pakistan, every country in the Commonwealth
either maintained or improved its YDI level of youth
development from 2010 to 2015. Table 2.4 shows
the youth population in Commonwealth countries in
2010 and 2015 by their YDI level.
2.3 Inequalities in youth development
While levels of youth development have improved
across the world between 2010 and 2015, progress
has been uneven. There are sharp disparities in youth
development between and within different regions
and countries. Although the YDI does not take into
account inequalities within countries, the extent
of inequality between countries can be gauged by
analysing the gap between youth development levels
of low and very high YDI countries.
Nearly three-quarters of the world’s youth population
is living in countries that fall in low or medium YDI
categories. Figure 2.8 shows the average scores
for the five domains of the YDI for each category of
youth development. There are significant differences
between countries that score very high and low on
youth development in all five domains of the YDI,
with the gap in Education being the largest, followed
by Health and Well-being, then Employment and
Opportunity. For both Education and Health and
Well-being domains, the average score of very high
youth development countries is nearly twice that
of low youth development countries, indicating the
persistence of high inequality between countries in
these key social sectors despite a narrowing of the
gap over the past five years.
The gap between low and very high YDI categories
for Commonwealth countries is largest in the
domains of Health and Well-being and Education
(Figure 2.9).
Table 2.5 shows the average score of all the 18
indicators for low, medium, high and very high YDI
categories. It can be observed that the average
score for most indicators progressively improves
from the low to the very high YDI category,
reflecting the better living conditions for young
people that exist in high YDI countries compared
with low YDI countries, though the degree of
improvement is not uniform across indicators. The
indicator scores that vary the most between the low
and very high YDI categories include digital native
rates, youth mortality rates, literacy rates, HIV rates,
existence of an account at a financial institution and
adolescent fertility rates:
• The proportion of young people who have been
online for at least five years is on average 11
times higher in very high YDI countries than in low
YDI countries (indicating a massive lag in access
to and usage of digital technology in low YDI
countries).
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents