PRESENTATION ON SOUTH AFRICA
Dr. Fanie du Toit: The Morning After: What Happens after the work
of the Commission: Recommendations and Implications.
I remember making a phone call to the
office of the Truth Commission in South
Africa just after the report had been
sent to President Mandela in 1998. The
phone just rang unanswered. Because
at that point our commissioners Yasmin
Suikah and others were all international
figures touring the world. They were
telling the story. And there was very
little left back home both institutionally
and in terms of personnel or staff to
actually do anything because its
recommendations had been handed
over to the government and now, we all assumed there would be political will to implement
these recommendations.
Well, we were wrong.
Fifteen years later the legacy of the Truth Commission in South Africa is under pressure because
of the failure to systematically implement what were 45 pages of very carefully crafted
recommendations. We failed to have a follow up mechanism that would be at least semiautonomous and that would keep the recommendations on the agenda of the government.
This has not happened once since 2003 when the final two volumes of the report were finally
handed over to President Mbeki and to parliament. The first five volumes were handed to
President Mandela in 1998, then followed five years of on-going amnesty hearings, and started,
but not finished, court cases. When all of that was finished, President Mbeki also received the
report in 2003 and announced a package of measures and reparations that the state would pay. It
was nothing like what the TRC had recommended. The TRC recommended something like the
basic minimum wage over six years for the victims and the government decided to give a once
Truth Commissions: the Best Practices
63
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents