68. Ad Para 6.7.5 Again, the affidavits referred to are not specified. The specific violations they relate to and how those alleged violations materially affect the result of the presidential election are also not spelt out. It is thus, difficult to plead to this paragraph. Out of an abundance of caution whatever allegations are made therein are denied. 69. Ad Para 6.8 This is denied. The applicant has failed to prove his case. He places no cogent evidence before the court establishing any material effect on the outcome of the 2018 presidential election. His application cannot succeed. 70. AD AFFIDAVIT BY DR. OTUMBA EDCAR OUKA The contents of Dr. Otuba’s Affidavit are denied. 70.1. I have attached an expert statistical report hereto, marked annexure Z, referenced herein above, which report relates and responds to the averments and analysis made by Dr. Otuba. I thus respond to his affidavit and report through the agency of annexure Z hereto and the various relevant depositions I have made in this affidavit. 71. AD AFFIDAVIT BY GEORGE NYANDORO The contents of Mr. Nyandoro’s affidavit are deined.