refused to participate in the second round. The Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum
reported significant human rights abuses during this time.
Accordingly, the election outcome of the second round, which kept President
Mugabe in power, was not recognised by the wider international community. After
months of difficult negotiations mediated by the former President of South Africa,
Thabo Mbeki, in his capacity as the facilitator for the Southern Africa Development
Community (SADC), a power-sharing agreement, the Global Political Agreement
(GPA), was reached. It resulted in Mugabe remaining President and Morgan
Tsvangirai becoming Prime Minister. In January 2013, talks involving President
Mugabe and Prime Minister Tsvangirai culminated in a new constitution, which was
approved by an overwhelming majority in a referendum.
In the first Harmonised Elections held under the new constitutional framework in
July 2013, Mugabe gained a seventh term in office and his party won three-quarters
of the seats in Parliament. The African Union Election Observation Mission noted in
its report that ‘the political antecedents that contributed to the post-elections
violence of 2008 were feared to still exist’. However, the report said that voting
was conducted in an atmosphere ‘devoid of violence, harassment and disturbances’
and ‘from a historical perspective and in comparison to the 2008 elections’ this was
generally an improved process.
The Southern African Development Community (SADC) commended the relatively
peaceful polls, but also highlighted some irregularities.
Both missions highlighted the polarisation and bias of the media during the elections.
In its report on the elections, ZESN highlighted its concerns about ‘critical factors’
such as ‘inadequate and delayed voter education, an inadequate and flawed voter
registration process, failure to provide the voters’ roll to political parties and
stakeholders on time, chaotic special voting, and the high numbers of assisted and
turned away voters’. ZESN concluded that these challenges ‘seriously compromised
the credibility and fairness’ of the 2013 elections. The opposition MDC dismissed
the polls as fraudulent.
Notably, the 2013 elections were held under the unreformed electoral framework.
Although the 2013 Constitution had been adopted, a Supreme Court judgement in
May 2013, directing the government to hold elections by 31 July, did not leave
sufficient time for the enactment of electoral reforms, which were being demanded
by the opposition and other stakeholders.
Lead-up to the 2018 elections
Changes in ZANU-PF
Following the missed opportunity of the 2013 elections, reformist elements began
to emerge within the ZANU-PF, but were quelled by purges. The first was the
7
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents