V. A Compromised Judiciary
The ZANU-PF government has undermined the independence of the judiciary. This
process began in earnest in 2000 when judges, on a number of occasions, ruled that
the government’s land reform program was unlawful. In a bid to revive fast-dwindling
political fortunes from February 16, 2000, ZANU-PF organized and instigated war
veterans to invade and occupy white-owned commercial farms.
The initial ruling on the matter was made in response to an application to the High
Court by the Commercial Farmers Union, an organization representing white farmers,
to have the “invasion” of farms declared illegal. On March 17, 2000, Justice
Paddington Garwe declared that the occupation of farms by squatters was unlawful,
ordered all squatters to vacate the farms within 24 hours, and directed the
Commissioner of Police Augustine Chihuri to instruct his officers and members to
enforce the order.20 The Court also ordered Chihuri to disregard any instruction from
any “person holding executive power in Zimbabwe” that countered the eviction order.
Commissioner of Police Chihuri appealed against the order, arguing that the police
did not have sufficient resources to enforce the order. On April 10, 2000, Justice
Moses Chinhengo dismissed the commissioner’s appeal and upheld Justice Garwe’s
order.21 However, police still did not take enforcement action.22
On November 10, 2000, the Supreme Court granted an order by consent declaring
that the entry of uninvited persons on commercial farming properties was unlawful
and that police must remove all squatters from the farms.23 The order was again not
implemented. On December 21, 2000, the Supreme Court ruled that the
government’s land reform program was unconstitutional and violated article 16 of
the Constitution, which guarantees property rights.24
20
See Commissioner of Police vs. Commercial Farmers Union (HC 3985/2000).
21
Address delivered by the Chief Justice Anthony R. Gubbay at the opening of the legal year in the High Court, Harare, January
8, 2001.
22
Ibid.
23
Ibid.
24
Ibid.
13
Human Rights Watch November 2008
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents