Figure 3 Comparison of annual frequency of reports, press versus cases, 2000 to 2006 30 Percentage of toal 25 20 press 15 cases 10 5 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Ye ar Again a very strong relationship was found between the two data sets as regards the alleged perpetrators of human rights violations. As can be seen from Figure 4 above, there is no difference in the frequencies of alleged perpetrators in either the press reports or the victim cases that were presented to the Human Rights Forum, and, statistically, the correlation was remarkably strong and positive.59 59 Rank order correlation between press and case reports, frequencies of alleged perpetrators [0.99; p=0.01]. Who guards the guards? Violations by the Zimbabwe Republic Police, 2000 to 2006