violated”
after
the
tenders
had
been
submitted.
50
Laxton
have
appealed
to
the
Administrative
Court
for
intervention:
by
the
end
of
January
2018,
ZEC
has
maintained
its
position
that
IPSIDY
should
provide
the
de-‐duplication
hardware
and
software,
“in
the
urgent
public
interest”,
the
court
appeal
notwithstanding….51
Other
aspects
of
how
the
data
is
being
consolidated
were
initially
flagged
by
Zimbabwe
Election
Support
Network
(ZESN).
Registration
information
is
apparently
being
transported
on
‘safe’
USBs
from
registration
points
to
centralized
data
collection
points.
What
this
exactly
entailed
and
how
the
USBs
are
safe
from
being
stolen,
duplicated
or
interfered
with
was
not
transparent
to
ZESN.52
However,
in
their
update
no.
14
on
21
December,
ZESN
noted
that
they
had
been
allowed
to
witness
data
discs
being
placed
in
tamper-‐proof
envelopes
in
registration
centres
and
that
by
and
large
they
were
happy
with
the
process.
However,
these
ZESN
updates
have
limited
reach,
and
general
doubts
about
the
security
of
BVR
data
may
well
remain
more
generally.
Long
before
BVR
began,
there
was
widespread
concern
that
ZANU
PF
had
been
systematically
biometrically
registering
their
supporters
since
2016
and
that
they
were
going
to
surreptitiously
slide
their
database
into
the
ZEC
database
to
ensure
that
all
their
voters
were
registered,
regardless
of
whether
they
registered
via
the
ZEC
BVR
process
or
not.53
Again,
there
is
no
evidence
for
this,
but
the
lack
of
general
knowledge
into
how
ZEC
is
amalgamating
all
its
data
that
is
being
variously
collected
from
its
centres
around
the
country
has
fueled
these
concerns.54
Roll-‐out
of
BVR
nationwide
In
September
2017,
the
BVR
began
with
a
preliminary
spate
of
registrations
with
a
limited
number
of
machines,
as
a
training
and
problem-‐shooting
exercise.
The
consensus
was
that
ZEC
staff
were
well
trained
and
polite,
and
were
not
in
any
way
obstructive
during
this
process.
However,
long
queues
and
the
slow
rate
at
which
registration
occurred
generated
some
complaints,
in
particular
in
the
cities,
in
these
initial
weeks,
with
very
limited
numbers
of
BVR
kits
in
action.
There
were
early
concerns
that
in
opposition
strongholds,
such
as
Bulawayo
and
Harare,
there
could
be
manipulation
of
the
process
simply
by
providing
not
enough
machines
here,
so
that
frustrated
would-‐be
voters
dropped
out
of
queues,
while
by
flooding
ZANU
PF
strongholds
with
registration
machines,
the
final
roll
could
be
slanted
in
favour
of
these
constituencies.55
In
early
October,
the
main
‘BVR
blitz’
began,
with
a
dramatic
increase
in
the
number
of
kits
and
staff
available
for
the
process.
2,697
BVR
kits
were
distributed
nationally,
through
all
ten
provinces,
with
252
kits
in
Harare
and
112
kits
in
Bulawayo,
to
be
rotated
through
approximately
700
and
400
centres
respectively,
over
an
initial
proposed
72
day
blitz
period.56
It
was
stated
by
ZEC
that
they
would
conduct
at
least
a
week
of
voter
education
ahead
of
registering
voters
in
any
area.
Civic
50
http://www.chronicle.co.zw/zimbabwe-‐electoral-‐commission-‐in-‐bvr-‐tender-‐storm/.
https://myhararetimes.com/us-‐firm-‐gets-‐zimbabwe-‐bvr-‐tender/.
52
ZESN
BVR
Update
Number
13.
53
Interviews,
Harare,
September
2017.
After
decades
of
experience
of
electoral
processes
that
have
been
abused,
civics
are
prone
to
expecting
and
imagining
the
worst.
There
is
no
evidence
that
this
will
happen,
but
the
fears
could
be
dampened
if
there
was
more
transparency
around
how
data
is
being
consolidated.
54
TIZ,
op
cit.
55
Interviews
with
civics
during
late
2017.
56
Share,
Felex:
“Zec
receives
2600
kits,
gears
up
for
voter
registration
blitz”,
The
Chronicle,
2
October
2017.
Also
ZEC’s
own
statistics:
Final
statistics
for
Phase
2,
accessible
through
www.zec.gov.zw.
51
16
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents