respondent against the will or unduly influenced them to vote for the 1st respondent or caused them confusion in identifying their preferred presidential candidate on the ballot paper. 17. Ad Para 4.5.24 No issues. 18. Ad Para 4.5.25 This is denied. 18.1. The separate bundle of evidence that the applicant refers to has not been availed to the respondents. 18.2. Polling station returns were affixed to all polling stations established by the Electoral Commission for the conduct of the 2018 general election. No proof has been placed before the court by the applicant indicating that there are polling stations where the returns were not affixed as required by the law. 18.3. It is not indicated at which polling stations the applicant alleges the returns were not affixed and whether he had polling agents stationed at such polling stations and if so why no affidavits have been deposed to by such agents in support of the applicant’s averment that 21% of polling stations did not have returns affixed in terms of the law.