This is denied. 60.1. The applicant seeks to call arguments based on probability in aid of his contentions of “manmade results” when the actual returns from the election are available and thus need only be produced to show that, contrary to the applicant’s averments, there are polling stations that returned identical results. The returns are signed by different polling agents, including the applicant’s polling agents. I attach a sample of the relevant returns to illustrate my averments hereto marked Annexure ‘1’. 60.2. The applicant’s contention that there are “manmade” results is thus not true. It cannot ground the relief that he seeks herein. 61. Ad Para 6.2.2.4 This is denied. The information on the CD provided by the Electoral Commission adds up to 100%. The applicant does not indicate whether in his calculation he considered rejected votes along with valid votes to come up with the total votes cast or he relied on the total valid votes only. The later formulation would yield a percentage less than 100% but the former formulation yields 100%. 62. Ad Para 6.6.3 This is denied.