62.1. All candidates were provided with an electronic copy of the voters’ roll. The only change that was made to the voters’ roll is the addition of the 230 voters registered on the Mashonaland West BVR kit as I have already averred herein above. 62.2. The applicant’s averment that his alleged lack of a voters’ roll gave the Electoral Commission the opportunity to illegitimately assist the 1st respondent is not substantiated by any evidence. No causal link is made between the alleged lack of a voters’ roll and the alleged illegitimate assistance. The alleged illegitimate assistance itself is not particularised. Its alleged effect on the presidential election in terms of altering the results is again not explained. The applicant’s allegation in this respect is bald and cannot ground the relief he seeks. 63. Ad Para 6.6.4 This is denied. 63.1. I refer to the affidavit by Mr. Munyaradzi Musodza in response attached hereto marked Annexure 3. I also point out that V11 forms had already been distributed to all polling agents present at polling stations after the counting of ballots. Forcing polling agents to change V11 forms as alleged, would yield no plausible benefit in the context of the election. 64. Ad Para 6.7- 6.7.1

Select target paragraph3

Add to table of contents