19 Table 2 Citizenship of the sample by Province. Manicaland Mash Cent Mash East Mash West Masvingo Mat North Mat South Midlands Zimbabwean 10 32 34 50 5 0 2 4 75% South Africa British 0 1 1 4 0 1 0 1 4% Other 1 7 9 8 0 0 4 1 17% 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 4% Forced to renounce citizenship? 5 11 9 22 1 0 1 0 27% It is also interesting [see Table 3 below] that the majority of those describing themselves as Zimbabwean citizens also report that they still reside in Zimbabwe: 75% described themselves as Zimbabweans, and 65% still reside in Zimbabwe. South Africa, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand have been the major destinations after the respondents were forced to leave their farms, whilst the remainder reported a wide variety of different countries: Malawi, Zambia, the USA, Portugal, Canada, and Tanzania were all mentioned. Interestingly, there was no-one that mentioned Nigeria as the place of migration. Only 6% of the sample reported still being on their farm. This is slightly higher than the current estimate for the number of remaining commercial farmers, about 186 according to a recent estimate by Justice for Agriculture. The difference may be accounted by the earlier completion of this questionnaire, which was initially distributed in June 2006. Table 3 Current residence of sample. South Africa UK Australasia Zimbabwe Manicaland 8 0 0 3 Europe/USA Other 0 0 Mash Cent 25 5 1 9 1 3 Mash East 32 2 3 4 1 2 Mash West 41 6 0 11 4 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 Masvingo Mat North 1 0 0 0 0 0 Mat South 5 0 0 0 0 1 Midlands 2 2 0 0 1 1 64.7% 8.2%5 2.2% 14.7% 3.8% 6.5% A Preliminary Report on Human Rights Violations on Commercial Farms, 2000 to 2005.