Overall, and despite 2008 being worse in most respects than 2002, there are great similarities in the
two election periods.
Firstly, the victims are overwhelmingly members of the MDC, with a much greater focus on actual
members of the MDC in 2008. As was seen above, a large number of the victims in 2002 were
reported as having “unknown” affiliations, insofar as they did not report an affiliation or were
unwilling to disclose one if they did. In 2008, the victims were possibly more willing to disclose their
affiliations, but it may also be that the violence was more specifically targeted in 2008, and certainly
many of these victims’ affiliations were known to their abusers since they had been openly
campaigning for the MDC or had played a role in the polling process: with the Harmonised Elections,
and four polls – Presidential, Senate, House of Assembly, and local government – the MDC had to
make public many more members of its structures than in any previous election. More simply put, the
MDC members were at much greater risk in 2008 than in 2002, as more of them had to be public as
officials and not merely voters.
Secondly, the perpetrators in both elections were preponderantly supporters of the ZANU PF party,
but, in 2008, two changes are noted. The ZRP are mentioned less frequently and the ZNA more
frequently. ZANU PF Youth and ZANU PF supporters are frequently mentioned as operating in concert
with “war veterans”, but it should be borne in mind that many “war veterans” are reported as
belonging to either the ZRP or the ZNA, so that it is plausible that the “war veterans” were members
of the uniformed forces, ZRP or ZNA, and even CIO, operating out of uniform. This deserves much
closer investigation than hitherto, as most reports to date are largely anecdotal or speculative.
Thirdly, the alleged violations are generally similar, but significantly more frequent in 2008, with the
caveat that torture in 2008 may have been much higher than shown due to the tendency to classify
serious beatings and physical abuse as assaults with intent to do grievous bodily harm. Closer
inspection of the medical reports accompanying these reports may well show that torture was
considerably higher in 2008 than in 2002.
6. Discussion
This report began where the previous Human Rights Forum report left off: raising the allegation that
crimes against humanity were committed in the June Presidential run-off. Other recent reports have
strongly implicated the state in the perpetration of gross human rights violations, but without raising
this charge, but nonetheless their evidence and conclusions have considerable bearing on this
allegation.
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents