Judgment No. CCZ 9/2015 6 Const. Application No. CCZ 287/11 [18] The above remarks have been repeated by this Court in several other cases since then. See for example the following: Matutu v S SC 34/13, Hellen Matiashe v (1) The Honourable Magistrate Mahwe N.O. (2) The Attorney General of Zimbabwe CCZ 12/14. APPLICATION NOT PROPERLY REFERRED [19] This application was therefore not properly referred to the Supreme Court sitting as a Constitutional Court. [20] In the circumstances, the Court had no option but to dismiss the application. CHIDYAUSIKU CJ: I agree MALABA DCJ: I agree ZIYAMBI JCC: I agree GWAUNZA JCC: I agree GOWORA JCC: I agree HLATSHWAYO JCC: I agree GUVAVA JCC: I agree