ELECTORAL ACT
____________________________________________________________________________________
156
When election not void
When upon the trial of an election petition the Electoral Court finds that a candidate at the
election the subject of the petition has been guilty by his or her agent of an electoral malpractice
with reference to that election, and the candidate has proved to the satisfaction of the Electoral
Court that—
(a) no electoral malpractice was committed at that election by the candidate himself or
herself or by his or her chief election agent and that the offences mentioned in the said
finding were committed without the sanction or connivance of the candidate or his or
her chief election agent; and
[Paragraph as amended by s. 87 of Act No. 17 of 2007]
(b) the candidate and his or her chief election agent took all reasonable precautions for
preventing the commission of electoral malpractices, corrupt practices and illegal
practices at that election; and
[Paragraph as amended by s. 87 of Act No. 17 of 2007]
(c) the offences mentioned in the finding were of a trivial, unimportant and limited
character;
then the election of that candidate shall not, by reason of the offences mentioned in the finding,
be void, nor shall the candidate or the chief election agent be subjected to any incapacity under
this Act.
[Section as amended by s. 87 of Act No. 17 of 2007]
157
When Electoral Court may hold certain acts or omissions to be exempt
from provisions of this Act
(1) When it appears to the Electoral Court, either on application or upon an election
petition, that—
(a) any act or omission of a candidate at an election or of his or her chief election agent or
of another agent or person, which but for this section would be an illegal practice, has
been done or made in good faith through inadvertence or accidental miscalculation or
some other reasonable cause of a like nature; and
(b) by reason of the circumstances it would be just that the candidate or his or her chief
election agent or other agent or person, or any of them, should not be subject to any of
the consequences under this Act of the said act or omission;
the Electoral Court may make an order allowing the act or omission to be an exception from the
provisions of this Act which would otherwise make the act or omission an illegal practice, and
thereupon the candidate, agent or person shall not be subject to any of the consequences under
this Act of the said act or omission.
(2) Where application is made for relief in terms of subsection (1), the Electoral Court,
before hearing the application, shall be satisfied that reasonable notice of the application has
been given in the constituency or area in which the election was held.
158
Hearing of person accused of corrupt practice or illegal practice
Before any person, not being a party to an election petition or a candidate on behalf of
whom the seat is claimed by an election petition, is found by the Electoral Court to have been
guilty of any electoral malpractice, the Electoral Court shall cause notice to be given to such
person and, if he or she appears in pursuance of the notice, shall give him or her an opportunity
of being heard and of calling evidence to show why no such finding should be recorded against
him or her.
[Section as amended by s. 87 of Act No. 17 of 2007]
159
Finding on charge of electoral malpractice
Any person charged with—
(a) a corrupt practice may, if the circumstances warrant such a finding, be found guilty of
an intimidatory practice or an illegal practice;
125
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents