4.5 WOZA survey
The ActionAid survey is strongly corroborated by research carried by Women of Zimbabwe Arise [WOZA]55. WOZA provides very
interesting data as it is concerned with the experiences of activists – frequently protesting in public - as opposed to the general public,
and allows a good understanding of the treatment meted out to those seen as dissident by the Zimbabwe state.
Using comparable methodology to the ActionAid study, and including the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire [HTQ], the WOZA research
provided very similar findings to the ActionAid survey. Of a total sample of 1,983 women interviewed, the HTQ was completed by
1,505 [76%] of the sample.
TABLE 13
Comparison of trauma between provinces: Pre-1980 and 1980-1999
Source: WOZA.200856
MASHONALAND
MATABELELAND
Pre-1980 [Experienced]
1.11
1.59*
Pre-1980 [Witnessed]
1.11
1.59*
Pre-1980 [OVT]
0.22
0.33*
Pre-1980 [Displaced]
0.43
0.53
1980-1999 [Experienced]
2.26
2.70*
1980-1999 [Witnessed]
2.45
3.55*
1980-1999 [OVT]
0.30
0.46*
1980-1999 [Displaced]
1.36
1.37
*p=0.001
Since WOZA derives a substantial part of its membership from Matabeleland, they reported upon a contrast between their
Matabeleland and Mashonaland members for the period before Independence [Pre-1980] and also for the period from Independence
to immediately prior to the growth of mass repression in 2000. As can be seen from Table 13, the Matabeleland sample reported
significantly high rates of reported trauma than their Mashonaland counterparts, and clearly much of this had to do with Gukurahundi,
as was also shown by a contrast between the older [over 35 years] and younger members in the Matabeleland sample. Thus, the
WOZA data also provides strong corroboration of the earlier assertion that organized violence and torture has been a common feature
of the Zimbabwean political landscape for several decades.
The WOZA study also provided good evidence for the trend, seen in the Human Rights Forum and the ActionAid data, of dramatically
increasing rates of reported trauma, which includes gross human rights violations since 2000, as can be seen from Table 14.
Interestingly, the WOZA data reports higher rates of “experienced” trauma than “witnessed” trauma, but it should be remembered
that this data, unlike the ActionAid data, derives from an “activist” organization, and hence from women that were deliberately facing
the possibility of being abused for their activities.
TABLE 14
Trauma scores by year 2000-2007
Source: WOZA.200857
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
HTQ[Total]
1.1
0.7
2.1
1.4
1.4
2.7
3.3
4.01
HTQ[Experienced]
0.6
0.4
1.1
0.8
0.8
1.4
1.8
2.1
HTQ[Witnessed]
0.5
0.4
1
0.6
0.64
1.3
1.4
1.96
HTQ[OVT]
0.1
0.03
0.11
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.4
HTQ[Displaced]
0.4
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.54
0.97
1.04
1.3
As can be seen from Figure 1 [over], which compares the frequency of reported trauma for Matabeleland and Mashonaland, the
trends are very similar for the years 2000 to 2003, but then the Matabeleland sample shows significantly elevated rates until 2006.
WOZA was formed in 2003 with a largely Matabeleland membership in their civic actions, and hence it is not surprising that the rates
of trauma reported by the Matabeleland members were higher in the early years of the organization. However, this trend changes
markedly in later years, and most drastically in 2007.
55
56
57
Page 18
See WOZA (2008), The effects of fighting repression with love. A report by Women of Zimbabwe Arise (WOZA). March 2008. ZIMBABWE: WOMEN OF ZIMBABWE
ARISE;WOZA (2008), The traumatic consequences of gross human rights violations suffered by WOZA women. HARARE: WOMEN OF ZIMBABWE ARISE.
See WOZA (2008), The traumatic consequences of gross human rights violations suffered by WOZA women. HARARE: WOMEN OF ZIMBABWE ARISE.
See again WOZA (2008), The traumatic consequences of gross human rights violations suffered by WOZA women. HARARE: WOMEN OF ZIMBABWE ARISE.
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents