Figure 4 Comparison of alleged perpetrators, press versus cases, 2000 to 2006 Percentage of total 120 100 80 press 60 cases 40 20 Zi m ba bw e R ep u ZR bl ic P P ZR Rio olic e t P Su Sq u pp ad or tU Zi m ZR nit ba P bw C ID e N Za at nu io n CIO (P a F) l A su rm y pp o ZN rte L r Yo WV ut A h M il it ia 0 Perpetrator Finally, as can be seen in Figure 5 [below], a similar effect was found in comparing the frequencies of alleged violations between the two data sets. The relationship was still statistically significant, but was not as strong as that found for the alleged geographical distribution or the frequency of alleged perpetrators.60 There was much wider variation between the two data sets than was apparent for geographical distribution or alleged perpetrators, but the correlation was still positive and significant. 60 Rank order correlation between press and case reports, frequencies of alleged violations [0.70; p=0.01] Who guards the guards? Violations by the Zimbabwe Republic Police, 2000 to 2006