Registration
patterns
after
the
resignation
of
Robert
Mugabe
There
was
speculation
among
civics
that
the
change
of
political
leadership
in
ZANU
PF
-‐
and
therefore
in
Zimbabwe
-‐
facilitated
by
military
intervention,
might
impact
negatively
on
people’s
inclination
to
register
for
elections:
a
message
had
been
sent
that
in
the
end,
it
was
the
army
and
not
the
will
of
the
people
that
was
able
to
get
Mugabe
out
of
the
presidency
after
37
years
of
unfair
elections.
What
then,
was
the
point
in
voting?
However,
this
concern
did
not
prove
to
be
the
case
in
the
first
instance
at
least.
During
the
three-‐
week
period
between
the
beginning
of
the
coup
and
the
appointment
of
Cabinet
by
the
newly
inaugurated
President
Mnangagwa,
there
was
widespread
talk
among
the
opposition
in
Zimbabwe
of
some
kind
of
transitional
authority
coming
into
effect
that
would
include
the
political
opposition
in
Cabinet
positions.
It
was
perceived
this
would
be
necessary
for
Mnangagwa
to
claim
national
and
international
legitimacy.
However,
when
Cabinet
was
announced
on
1
December,
it
was
entirely
a
ZANU
PF
affair,
inclusive
of
several
army
generals
who
had
facilitated
Mnangagwa’s
rise
to
power.
But
during
the
time
of
the
talk
of
an
inclusive
government,
there
was
a
surge
of
voter
registrations
reported
in
Bulawayo.
One
ZEC
official
at
a
central
location
in
Bulawayo
informed
us
that
registrations
surged
from
a
few
a
day,
to
over
100
a
day
at
his
site.
It
appeared
that
Mugabe
finally
leaving
power
had
created
a
sense
of
change
and
a
sense
that
perhaps
further
change
could
also
be
possible.
People
seemed
more
motivated
to
take
part
in
any
future
voting
processes.
The
figures
for
BVR
at
the
end
of
the
3rd
phase
of
the
Blitz,
which
coincidentally
was
on
the
day
after
Mnangagwa
announced
his
Cabinet,
are
shown
in
Graph
4.
Graph
4
BVR
Numbers:
1
December
2017
(ZEC)
600000
552546
500000
452852
399901
400000
358098
471719
431113
364649
300000
204880
200000
141488
155331
100000
0
30
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents