A related critical point worth underlining is the inheritance of the Rhodesian culture of impunity
and the normalisation of the Lancaster house precedent of judicial amnesia. This is exemplified
in the way in which the state dealt with human rights violators after the Matabeleland atrocities.
After the unity accord of 27th March 1987, an amnesty for dissidents was deemed imperative for
the sake of peace. However, to date there are unanswered questions about the deaths of some
alleged dissidents, including Lookout Masuku, a senior ZAPU official who was detained in 1982
and died in 1986.
In June, this amnesty was extended to the army and other state actors. Seventy–five security
force members who had either been sentenced or were awaiting trial for several human rights
violations and four Fifth Brigade soldiers who were on death row for committing murder in
Matabeleland are some of those who escaped justice. A pattern of impunity was thus set for the
current era.
II
1989-1999
If there was ever a time when Zimbabweans enjoyed a semblance of peace, it was during the
period from 1990 to 1996. After the state of emergency ended in 1990, the government ratified a
number of international conventions and even collaborated with non-governmental
organisations in providing human rights training to the police and prison officers. However, the
culture of impunity still manifested itself on some three occasions, when the government was
faced with allegations of human rights violations by its state machinery.
Firstly, this was through the granting of amnesty to alleged perpetrators of human rights abuses
after the 1990 and 1995 elections, which were considered to be marred by state –linked political
violence. Secondly, in the wake of the 1998 food riots, the government ignored human rights
organisations' calls for the creation of an independent inquiry, which would look at the reported
abuses. Similarly, the United Nations Human Rights' Committee's recommendations that an
impartial inquiry be set up were not acted upon. Thirdly, when faced with a court action initiated
by domestic human rights organisations in 1999 compelling the release of the report on the
1983-1987 Matabeleland atrocities, the government simply stated that the document had been
misplaced.
Nevertheless, in 1999, a formidable opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) was born and ZANU PF ceased to be politically secure. It became extremely hostile to
both human rights organisations and the opposition party as it saw them as vicarious agents of
foreign ideologies. It thus stopped making any pretences at taking responsibility for alleged
24
The Second International Conference on Transitional Justice in Zimbabwe
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents