8.2. The mention of ‘Alexandra Mujayi’ and ‘Oliver Mafungo’, by the applicant, is not linked to any other relevant information such as the villages they are said to head, polling stations that they are said to have acted as agents, the political party or candidate for whom they are alleged to have so acted. 8.3. Further, the applicant lodged no complaint with the Electoral Commission in terms of s239(k) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe viz. the incidents of use of traditional leaders in electoral processes that he alleges. The matters thus did not come to the Electoral Commission’s attention for resolution. 8.4. Regarding the ‘rogue elements’ the applicant refers to as identifying themselves as being from the security sector, the averment is lacking in particularity that there is no cogent way to plead to it. No specific incidents are referenced. No affidavits by affected voters are furnished. All that is presented are bald and general averments, which, in motion proceedings, serve to establish nothing. 8.5. The lack of specificity, with respect, cannot then demonstrate as the applicant seeks to do, that the 23rd respondent has breached its constitutional and statutory duties, more so where the weight of reports by regional and international election observer missions have endorsed the 2018 general election as having been conducted in a peaceful, free and fair manner. 9. Ad Para 4.5.6- 4.5.7 No issues.