outcome of the presidential election and thus cannot ground the vacation of the declaration I made in terms of s110(3)(f)(ii) of the Electoral Act. I also refer to the statistical report attached hereto in support of my averment herein. The report is marked annexure ‘Z’ and is refenced below. 37. Ad Para 6.2 This is denied. I reiterate my averments made above. 38. Ad Para 6.2.1 This is denied. 38.1. All V11s and V23s for the presidential election were physically delivered by all relevant elections officers to the Electoral Commission’s national command centre and formed the basis of collation and verification of the results for the presidential election. 38.2. I have, in my depositions thus far, shown that not only were the original V11 and V23 forms used in the collation and verification of presidential election results at the national command centre but also that the applicant’s election agents were involved in that process and were given, upon request, access to any of the V11 and V23 forms for purposes of verification. 38.3. The provisions of s110 of the Electoral Act do not oblige the Electoral Commission, in the declaration of a winner in a presidential election, to