62.1. All candidates were provided with an electronic copy of the voters’ roll. The
only change that was made to the voters’ roll is the addition of the 230 voters
registered on the Mashonaland West BVR kit as I have already averred herein
above.
62.2. The applicant’s averment that his alleged lack of a voters’ roll gave the
Electoral Commission the opportunity to illegitimately assist the 1st respondent is
not substantiated by any evidence. No causal link is made between the alleged
lack of a voters’ roll and the alleged illegitimate assistance. The alleged
illegitimate assistance itself is not particularised. Its alleged effect on the
presidential election in terms of altering the results is again not explained. The
applicant’s allegation in this respect is bald and cannot ground the relief he
seeks.
63. Ad Para 6.6.4
This is denied.
63.1. I refer to the affidavit by Mr. Munyaradzi Musodza in response attached
hereto marked Annexure 3. I also point out that V11 forms had already been
distributed to all polling agents present at polling stations after the counting of
ballots. Forcing polling agents to change V11 forms as alleged, would yield no
plausible benefit in the context of the election.
64. Ad Para 6.7- 6.7.1
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents