4 (e) any person found in the brothel who wilfully refuses to disclose the name and identity of the keeper or owner thereof. PART II EXTRA-MARITAL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH YOUNG PERSONS AND INTELLECTUALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONS 3 Extra-marital sexual intercourse or immoral or indecent act committed with young person (1) Subject to subsection (2), any person who— (a) has extra-marital sexual intercourse with a young person; or (b) commits an immoral or indecent act with or upon a young person; or (c) solicits or entices a young person to have extra-marital sexual intercourse with him or to commit an immoral or indecent act; shall be guilty of an offence and liable, subject to section sixteen, to a fine not exceeding fifty thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding ten years or to both such fine and such imprisonment. (2) It shall be a defence to a charge under subsection (1) for the accused person to satisfy the court that— (a) he was under the age of sixteen years at the time of the alleged offence; or (b) he had reasonable cause to believe that the young person concerned was of or over the age of sixteen years at the time of the alleged offence. 4 Extra-marital sexual intercourse or immoral or indecent act committed with intellectually handicapped person (1) In this section— “intellectually handicapped person” means a person who is mentally disordered or intellectually handicapped, as defined in section 2 of the Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12]. (2) Subject to subsection (3), any person who— (a) has extra-marital sexual intercourse with an intellectually handicapped person; or (b) commits an immoral or indecent act with an intellectually handicapped person; or (c) solicits or entices an intellectually handicapped person to have extra-marital sexual intercourse with him or to commit an immoral or indecent act; shall be guilty of an offence and liable, subject to section sixteen, to a fine not exceeding fifty thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding ten years or to both such fine and such imprisonment. (3) It shall be a defence to a charge under subsection (2) for the accused person to satisfy the court that he did not know that the person to or with whom he committed the act alleged in the charge was intellectually handicapped.