21
=/+5DWQDWLRQDOOHYHO
Litigation was the main intervention and was complemented by other activities that included research, advocacy and capacity building. The Protection of
Human Rights Defenders programme area provided legal support to human rights defenders (HRDs) who were arrested or targeted by state actors for asserting
their economic, social, civil and political rights. This support was on an emergency basis and also as follow up to prevent the beneficiaries who were prosecuted
and tried from being convicted, enabling them to continue with their work of defending the Constitution and asserting their fundamental freedoms and
human rights. HRDs were better able to continue with their work knowing full well that lawyers would be available to assist them.
Victims of human rights violations from different social backgrounds were assisted
within the Access to Justice priority area. Lawyers instituted litigation to enforce
constitutional rights and obligations before the superior courts, challenging
unconstitutional laws and arbitrary decisions. Public interest litigation (PIL)
continued to be taken up benefitting individuals and communities whose
social, economic, cultural, civil and political rights had been, or were at risk of,
being violated. A number of these cases were of strategic impact, i.e. having a
wider impact beyond the primary litigant of the case. ZLHR also pursued antiimpunity cases that focused on instituting civil claims against state and non-state
actors who, through their actions that included use of torture, assault, malicious
prosecutions and persecutions against individuals, violated fundamental human
rights of individuals.
/RFDWLRQDQGQXPEHURIOHJDOVHUYLFHV
EHQHILFLDULHV
*DPELD
W/>
0DVYLQJR
,ZƐ
0DW6RXWK
0DW1RUWK
0DVK:HVW
0DVK&HQWUDO
0DVK(DVW
0LGODQGV
%XODZD\R
+DUDUH
0DQLFDODQG
Ϭ
ϭϬϬ
ϮϬϬ
ϯϬϬ
ϰϬϬ
ϱϬϬ
ϲϬϬ
ϳϬϬ
ZLHR Annual Report 2016
R OLWLJDWLRQFDVHVFDUULHGRXWHPHUJHQF\DVVLVWDQFHWR+5'V
IROORZXSDQGSXEOLFLQWHUHVWPDWWHUV
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents