33
(QJDJLQJJRYHUQPHQW
ZLHR continued to engage relevant government
institutions in order to influence legal and
institutional reforms that undermine human
rights in the country. This was done through a
number of targeted interactions with Parliament,
the Judicial Service Commission, the Ministry
of Justice, the Department of Prisons and the
Ministry of Health. ZLHR also engaged with the
Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission.
Parliament breakfast meeting
There was continuous engagement with Parliament throughout the year. Other than presenting
oral submissions at the invitation of Parliament in
February, ZLHR also organised and facilitated a
number of low-cost breakfast meetings in Harare.
Discussions focused on legal, institutional
reforms, facilitating a dialogue between lawyers
and law makers that sought to enhance not
only the legislative role of Parliament but their
oversight of government departments.
On 29 July 2016, ZLHR held a breakfast
meeting for parliamentarians which was attended
by 31 participants (19 male and 12 females) from
the Senate Thematic Committee on Human
Rights, the Parliamentary Portfolio Committees
on Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs and
Local Government and National Housing as
well as the Parliamentary Legal Committee.
The objectives of the workshop were to enhance
Parliament’s awareness of the Universal Periodic
Review process and its oversight role in ensuring
the improvement of the human rights situation
in the country. It also aimed to create a platform
to initiate the formulation of oversight strategies
that Parliament can adopt for the upcoming UPR
process to be effective.
0LQLVWU\RI+HDOWKDQG&KLOG&DUH
In order to influence conversations on health,
policy engagements were implemented that
involved engaging CSOs, Members of Parliament
and key Ministry of Health officials. Policy
dialogue sessions, advocacy round tables and
stakeholder meetings were some of the platforms
used to undertake advocacy on policy. Key officials
from central government were also invited to be
participants at some of the meetings. For instance,
during the round table meeting on the reform of
the Public Health Act, the Permanent Secretary of
the Ministry of Health attended as a key resource
person. Other dialogue sessions focused mainly
on sensitising parliamentarians on access to
medicines in the context of intellectual property.
These discussions enabled parliamentarians in
the Thematic Committee on Health to formulate
plans of action around law reform on intellectual
property. Policy dialogue sessions reached out
to 46 Members of Parliament (22 males and 24
females).
ŝĂůŽŐƵĞƐ
ϭϮϬ
ϭϬϬ
DĂůĞ
ϴϬ
&ĞŵĂůĞ
ϲϬ
dŽƚĂů
ϰϬ
ϮϬ
Ϭ
DĞŵďĞƌƐŽĨ
WĂƌůŝĂŵĞŶƚĚŝĂůŽŐƵĞͲ
ĞŝƚďƌŝĚŐĞ
W,ƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐ
ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ
DWW,ĚǀŽĐĂĐLJ
ZŽƵŶĚƚĂďůĞ
WŽůŝĐLJĚŝĂůŽŐƵĞ
ZLHR Annual Report 2016
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents