Previous 48 / 48 Next

Judgment No. CCZ 9/2016 48 Const. Application No. CCZ 316/2012 GARWE JCC: I agree GOWORA JCC: I agree HLATSHWAYO JCC: I agree PATEL JCC: I agree GUVAVA JCC: I agree MAVANGIRA AJCC: I agree Mtetwa & Nyambirai, applicants’ legal practitioners Mambosasa, respondent’s legal practitioners

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Info
0Relationships

CCZ 09 16 BENARD WEKARE v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Justice & accountability

Preview

Date recorded: Jul 20, 2016

Category

Politics & Governance

Summary: The two cases were heard together because they raised the same constitutional questions for determination. The cases are about the constitutionality of the provisions of the Broadcasting Services Act [Cap. 12:06] (“the Act”) on funding for the provision of public broadcasting services.

Primary Documents

CCZ 09-16 - BENARD WEKARE v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.pdf
English
Download View

Human Rights Archive Zimbabwe

Select target paragraph3

CCZ 09 16 BENARD WEKARE v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Primary Documents

Notifications