REDRESS/AMANI
(i) 1 9 8 0 -1 9 8 2
Compared to the years before independence, this was a period of relative peace
when human rights abuses fell dramatically during the euphoria following the end of
the bitter civil war.22 On coming to power with an absolute majority, Mugabe
adopted a policy of reconciliation towards the whites and towards his black rivals,
forming a Government of national unity with Nkomos PF-Zapu party. The state of
emergency which Smith had announced in 1965 before UDI, however, was retained
and indeed was to continue right up to 1990, 23 along with almost all of the
repressive security laws inherited from the previous regime.
(ii) 1 9 8 2 1 9 8 8 (Ù«µ«®¿¸«²¼·)
The uneasy coalition between Mugabe and Nkomo was short-lived, and for a variety
of reasons broke down completely during 1982, leading to six years of civil war
known as the Gukurahundi.24 The two leaders had never trusted each other, and
there was an ethnic element involved in that Zanu-PF was predominately a party of
the Shona majority in the east, while the older PF-Zapu party drew most of its
support from the Ndebele minority in the west. Agents of apartheid South Africa
played a role in exacerbating existing rivalries, leading to serious security problems
in various parts of the country, particularly in the western half.
Bandits or
dissidentsbegan killing civilians and destroying property, and the government
responded with a huge security clampdown on Matabeleland and parts of the
Midlands. What followed were two overlapping conflicts. The first was the one
between the dissidents and the Government security forces. The second was that
directed by Government agencies against all those thought to support PF-Zapu. In
this latter conflict the Government units committed many gross human rights
violations. 25 Thousands of unarmed civilians died, were physically tortured (torture
included rape and the phenomenon of mass beatings), or suffered loss of property,
Zimbabwe: Past, present and future, a paper presented to the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria
on 19 March 2003, published by Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights in Zimbabwe Human Rights Bulletin Issue No
9, Harare, October 2003, p. 113.
22
It was by no means entirely peaceful. There were a number of major clashes between Zanla and Zipra soldiers
during their amalgamation with the former Rhodesian security forces into a new national army. Agents of apartheid
South Africa also committed serious acts of sabotage including the destruction of a substantial percentage of
Zimbabwes Air Force aircraft at the Thornhill air base in Gweru in July 1982. This latter episode led to the
detention, torture and trial of six local white air-force officers (including Air Vice Marshall Hugh Slatter, the Chief of
Staff of the Zimbabwe Air Force) who had been members of the Rhodesian Air Force and who had remained after
independence and sworn allegiance to the new state, but who were suspected of having been involved in the
destruction. They were acquitted, the judge ruling that their confessions made under torture were inadmissible, but
they were promptly re-detained and only released on condition that they immediately left their country. See S v
Slatter & Others 1983 (2) ZLR 144 (H).
23
The state of emergency had to be renewed by Parliament every six months, and was so renewed by Mugabes
Government for the next ten years until being finally lifted in July 1990. Thus for a quarter of a century, from 1965
to 1990, a state of emergency prevailed. This gave the power to legislate by regulation, rather than through
Parliament. Regulations included the Emergency Powers (Maintenance of Law and Order) Regulations, which gave
sweeping powers of arrest and detention without trial, the right to control meetings, and so on. During those
twenty-five years, both the RF and Zanu-Pf Governments used emergency powers to authorise many infringements
of human rights.
24
The name means
the rain that washes away the chaff from the last harvest, before the spring rains
, after the
notorious North Korean-trained Five Brigade which led the Governments assault against unarmed civilians in those
rural areas which traditionally supported PF-Zapu.
25
In the conflict between the security forces and the dissidents there were few actual military engagements
between the two sides. The Government saw the conflict with dissidents and the conflict with PF-Zapu as the same,
and that to support PF-Zapu was tantamount to supporting dissidents, which was not the case. Rural civilians again
bore the brunt of the violence as they did during the liberation struggle, as once more they were caught in the
middle of a problem not of their making.
5