households received too many bags against the required criteria by the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare. The complainants highlighted they had not reported the matter since they did not know where to report as it was the Headman who was conniving with a Community Child Care Worker. Others highlighted that they were afraid of reporting the issue at the police since they feared that they would be called in to witness and support the complaint. 2. RESPONDENTS’ ACCOUNTS In accordance with the audi alteram partem rule ("let the other side be heard as well”), the ZHRC held separate meetings with the respondents so as to hear their side of the story. From the separate meetings and in response to the allegations raised by the complainants, the following information was gathered: 2.1 Village Head Shundure 1 Village – the ZHRC spoke to the Village Head from Shundure Village 1 who denied the allegations raised by the complainants and stated as follows: 2.1.1 That he had not received any complaint from the community members on the allegations raised. 2.1.2 He, however, noted that intimidation was rife in the area as community members were being forced to attend political meetings by those allied to the ruling party, ZANU PF. He alleged that people ended up attending the political meetings due to fear of being left out when food aid distribution exercises are taking place. 2.2 Councillor Tsoriyo – the ZHRC also managed to interview Mrs. Tsoriyo, the Councillor for Shundure who stated as follows; 2.2.1 She confirmed the allegations but denied any one being forced to do so. She indicated that community members who submitted the serial numbers did so on a voluntary basis. 2.2.2 She indicated that village heads and councillors are asked how many people in their areas are registered to vote. Therefore, the exercise Page 4 of 10

Select target paragraph3