Previous 5 / 5 Next

Judgment No. CCZ 6/201415 Const. Application No. CCZ 247/09 GARWEJA: I agree GOWORAJA: I agree HLA TSHWAYO JA: I agree PATEL JA: I agree GUVAVAJA: I agree Messrs Atherstone & Cook, applicant's practitioners Office of the Attorney-General, respondent's legal practitioners

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Info
0Relationships

CCZ 06 14 CHIMAKURE & 2 ORS v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Justice & accountability

Preview

Date recorded: Jul 22, 2014

Category

Politics & Governance

Summary: The court had found that s 31(a)(iii) of the Criminal Code had the effect of interfering with the exercise of the right to freedom of expression. It found that the applicants had discharged the onus of showing that s 31(a)(iii) of the Criminal Code was not reasonably justifiable in a democratic. society for the protection of the public interest in public order or public safety.

Primary Documents

CCZ 06-14 - CHIMAKURE & 2 ORS v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.pdf
English
Download View

Human Rights Archive Zimbabwe

Select target paragraph3

CCZ 06 14 CHIMAKURE & 2 ORS v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Primary Documents

Notifications