Electoral Law Must Prohibit State Officials’ Public Statements Threatening Free and Fair Elections By Zimbabwe Election Support Network (ZESN) Elections in Zimbabwe have always been marred by acts of violence and intimidation. As far back as 1980, when Zimbabwe held its first democratic elections, there were complaints of violence and intimidation. At the time, the euphoria brought by independence overshadowed the violence that had taken place. Although the elections were passed as free and fair, the benefit of hindsight shows that it set a bad precedent which would be repeated in future elections. Violence and intimidation have almost become part of the country’s political culture. Elections have become synonymous with violence. This is not right. As the world witnessed in the run-up to the Presidential Run-Off election between March and June 2008, violence claimed many limbs, lives and property – causing untold suffering amongst ordinary people. In the end, violence and intimidation meant the process and result of that election became severely compromised. The legitimacy of the result was contested and could not be sustained – and without any viable option, the political parties ended up negotiating a power-sharing deal under which the country is currently governed. There can be no doubt, however, that if any future election is to have legitimacy and universal acceptance, the cancerous strain of violence and intimidation must be removed. It is important to critically assess how the proposed reforms to the electoral laws attempt to deal with this problem and to determine their strengths and weaknesses. Code of Conduct The measures against politically-motivated violence include a code of conduct set out in a schedule of the Electoral Act, with which all political parties and candidates in an election are expected to abide. The proposals place responsibility on political parties and candidates contesting an election to take steps to prevent politically-motivated violence and intimidation. ZESN recommends however, the necessity of setting out clearly the legal consequences of any failure to comply with the code of conduct. There must be specific sanctions which detail the effect of any breaches of that code of conduct on the legality of the election. A critical question would be whether a breach of the code of conduct affects the legality of the election. At what point does politically-motivated violence and intimidation affect the legality of the election? A code of conduct without specific legal sanctions that go to the core of the election’s legality can be easily flouted. Special Structures Dealing with Political Violence The proposals also include a fairly elaborate architecture of policing, investigating and prosecuting offenders accused of committing acts of violence and intimidation. This includes the appointment of a special police liaison officer and special investigations committee for each province which together will be specifically responsible for the expeditious investigation of cases of politically-motivated violence or intimidation within each province. The appointment of the SPLO will be done by the Police Commissioner General “in consultation with” the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission (ZHRC), the constitutional body which oversees the protection of human rights. If the spirit of this clause is upheld, it 1

Select target paragraph3