not to be compelled to take part in any political activity.’ In the present case, the Commission observed some children who were providing entertainment at the youth interface rallies held at Mkoba Teachers College in Gweru on the 1st of September 2017 and at White City Stadium in Bulawayo on the 4th of November 2017. The use of children to provide entertainment at political rallies could be said to be compelling children to attend political rallies. However, asserting the “compelling” was difficult as it can be argued that the children might have felt privileged to provide entertainment at such a high profile meeting. A solution to this is found in the Children’s Act Chapter 5:06. 7.2. The use of children to provide entertainment in public places is criminalised in terms of the Children’s Act. Section 10 (1) (d) provides that :- Any parent or guardian of a child or young person who allows that child or young person or any person who causes any child or young person to perform or be exhibited in any way for public entertainment in a manner likely to be detrimental to the child's or young person's health, morals, mind or body; shall be guilty of an offence and liable to a fine not exceeding level six or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year or to both such fine and such imprisonment. Children dressed in party regalia were used to provide entertainment through provocative dances. The provocative dances have a negative bearing on the morals of children. At the Bulawayo Youth Interface Rally held on the 4th of November 2017 at White City Stadium, a Primary School going child was made to provide entertainment in the form of a poem in which she was singing praises to the former President and first lady. 7.3. Furthermore, the children were exposed to hate, disrespectful and discriminatory speech that presupposes some tribes are better than other tribes and that anyone who opposes the ruling party is an enemy and should not be listened to. The speeches seemed to promote violence in the event of people having views that are different from those of the former first family as the speeches were tearing into some Page 6 of 17

Select target paragraph3