ZANU-PF. Speaking up against the government is taken as speaking up against ZANU-PF.
Such is the extent of the parochial cultures in much of Zimbabwe including the urban centres.
A critical cog in the dominant parochial culture in Zimbabwe is the concentration of powers
in a few people who have legal/legitimate and political power to influence the important arms
of government, including the agenda of parliament, and the decisions of the courts are often
abused. The law is used as a tool for intimidation of dissenting voices and simultaneously
protecting ZANU-PF supporters whose crimes are often conveniently and ambiguously
presented and defended as having been done for the furtherance of ZANU-PF interest. Some
participants gave the example of ZANU-PF rallies where both primary and secondary school
children are forced to abandon their school work and attend ostensibly because the “president
is coming”.
The village headmen, “MaSabhuku”, are also part of the system. They call all villagers to
attend village meetings where the ZANU chair addresses and whips people into line, thereby
fostering a culture of suspicion and distrust. In some areas, people are made to attend ZANUPF rallies and political meetings daily where they are reminded of the liberation war, the
violence of the 2008 election, and are “warned” that what happened to others during those
days will happen to them if they do not vote for ZANU-PF. At such meetings, residents are
constantly being reminded that election observers only observe during elections and not
before or after the elections. Effectively, residents are constantly being told that they have no
recourse against ZANU-PF aggression. The net effect of the conveniently created and
deployed ambiguities between ZANU-PF and the government as well as the constant
reminders of the liberation war and electoral violence is to discourage people from taking
risks by thus actively cultivating risk aversion amongst the people.
Participants concurred that political cultures have a clear and central role in shaping risk
taking behaviour of the citizens. Part of the configuration of the political cultures in
Zimbabwe is the how inter and intra-party conflict manifests in the public domain. Within
ZANU-PF, the Gamatox (Weevils) clash resulted in high level casualties and many people
lost their positions in and outside the party simply because they were fingered as belonging to
the losing faction. Factionalism has also crept into the main opposition party the MDC. As
noted by one respondent, most of the leading figures during the formation of the MDC have
gone on to form their own splinter parties, leaving the MDC because of factionalism.
Essentially, the idea of having one unified ZANU-PF and one unified opposition is vanishing
by the day as the key figures in the political parties fight over positions decisions. These
leading figures are the few that can claim to be true participants within their own parties with
the rest being subject to the decisions made in the higher offices. In discussing governance
issues, ordinary members only follow the official party position. Risk aversion among the
ordinary people can thus, be seen as coming from fear of being labelled “traitor” “Gamatox”
among other terms used to describe people opposing the party’ stance. The parochial culture
is now being forced on school children who are forced to recite the “National Pledge” without
any consultation of their parents.
For some respondents, risk taking behaviour is contextual and there is a need to look at
factors that are active at the local level. According to this view, Zimbabwe has a concoction
of all the three main types of political cultures and each town/centre has its own culture
depending on the how the dialectics of political power differentials between ZANU-PF and
the opposition are expressed and how locals navigate them. At the national level, there are
elements of the participant sub-culture: for example, parliamentary portfolio committees that
make some attempt to consult the people even though they are not entirely transparent. The
21
Select target paragraph3
Add to table of contents