Judgment No. CCZ 14/2016110 Const. Application No. CCZ 67/13 national interest. If the ZBC is biased towards ZANU-PF in its programming as alleged by the applicant, it commits conduct which is in breach of its statutory obligations. The conduct complained of does not give rise to a constitutional matter at all. Where a law of general application prohibits conduct, the commission of such conduct does not give rise to a constitutional question. The question of the legality of the conduct is determined on the basis of the interpretation and application of the statutory provision prohibiting the conduct unless the constitutionality of the statutory provision itself is challenged. Bias is a wellknown ground for review of administrative conduct in administrative law. The Administrative Justice Act [Cap. 10:28] provides effective procedural and substantive remedies for the protection of the applicant's rights. Under the Administrative Justice Act, an applicant would be entitled to administrative conduct on the part of the ZBC which gives effect to the right to unbiased selection and presentation of programmes on news and current affairs as required by para. (d) of Part 1 of the Seventh Schedule to the Act. The applicant challenged the con$titutional validity o( ss 38B(2), 38C and 380(1)-(4) of the Act on the ground that the provisions authorize the ZBC to compulsorily deprive her of property in the form of money paid as a licence fee not for a public purpose but for the purpose of funding ZANU-PF propaganda "through programmes broadcast on television and radio. Section 38B(l) of the Act is the root provision as it imposes the obligation to pay the tax on every person who is in possession of~ gadget capable of receiving a broadcasting