Chiwenga,
was
appointed
the
Vice
President
of
Zimbabwe.
In
accordance
with
the
Unity
Accord
signed
in
1987
a
Second
Vice
President
from
Zanu
PF’s
junior
partner
in
Government
the
other
liberation
party
ZAPU,
was
also
appointed,
namely
Kembo
Mohadi,
a
war
veteran.
SADC,
the
AU
and
International
Players
In
the
first
stage
of
these
developments,
both
SADC
and
the
AU
reaffirmed
their
commitment
to
SADC’s
Democratic
Principles
as
they
relate
to
the
unconstitutional
removal
of
democratically
elected
governments
and
the
AU
Constitutive
Act.19
The
SADC
Organ
Troika
which
met
on
the
16th
November,
then
recommended
an
urgent
Extra
Ordinary
SADC
Summit
on
Zimbabwe,
which
summit
in
turn
delegated
the
Presidents
of
South
Africa
and
Angola
to
undertake
a
mission
to
Zimbabwe
on
the
22nd
November
to
assess
the
situation.20
This
intended
mission
never
took
place,
as
it
was
overtaken
by
the
processes
leading
to
the
resignation
of
Mugabe.
Soon
after
the
events,
SADC
responded
positively
to
Mugabe’s
resignation
hailing
the
‘discipline
and
peacefulness
of
the
people
of
Zimbabwe’.21
Despite
the
SADC
official
commitment
to
constitutionality,
it
can
be
argued
the
South
African
government
in
particular,
since
the
time
of
Mbeki’s
mediation,
has
favoured
a
reformed
Zanu
PF
through
the
stabilising
force
of
the
military,
as
the
preferred
option
for
change
in
Zimbabwe.
It
was
clear
that
the
Zuma
administration
were
fully
briefed
on
Operation
Restore
the
Legacy
as
it
unfolded.
One
report
noted
that
Zuma
was
‘thankful
that
throughout
the
operation
the
Zimbabwe
Defence
Forces
Command
kept
briefing
the
SADF
to
a
point
that
the
SA
Government,
through
its
defence
arm,
was
always
aware
of
what
was
happening.’22
It
is
also
likely
that
the
EU
and
the
UK
will
come
on
board
with
this
change.
Since
the
2013
election
which
once
again
kept
Zanu
PF
in
power,
the
EU
has
been
at
pains
to
find
a
workable
means
of
engagement
with
the
Mugabe
regime,
particularly
through
assistance
given
for
electoral
reform.
As
it
is
clear
that
there
is
unlikely
to
be
any
serious
electoral
reform
ahead
of
the
2018
elections,
the
continuation
of
Mugabe’s
Presidency
would
have
presented
a
real
challenge
for
the
EU.
Some
form
of
reform
process
without
Mugabe
will
provide
the
EU
with
a
new
opening
for
further
engagement,
as
it
will
for
the
British
Government.
Western
countries
as
well
as
China
and
Russia
all
‘tempered
their
reaction
and
avoided
condemning
the
military
intervention’
because
of
an
international
consensus
that
Mugabe
needed
to
be
replaced.23
With
regard
to
the
US,
given
the
multiple
errors
that
the
Trump
administration
is
currently
making
on
the
global
stage,
and
the
minor
importance
of
Zimbabwe
in
the
geopolitical
calculations
of
America,
it
is
highly
likely
that
there
will
be
little
attention
given
to
developing
a
new
policy
on
the
country.
The
sanctions
imposed
on
Zimbabwe
through
the
Zimbabwe
Democracy
and
Economic
Reconstruction
Act
in
2001
are
likely
to
remain
in
place.
19
Press
Statement:
SADC
Organ
Troika
plus
Council
Chairperson
Ministerial
Meeting
on
the
Political
Situation
in
the
Republic
of
Zimbabwe,
Gaborone,
16
November
2017;
‘The
World
reacts
to
ZDF
intervention’,
Herald
17/11/17.
20
Communique
of
the
Summit
of
the
Organ
Troika
plus
SADC
Chair
on
the
political
situation
in
the
Republic
of
Zimbabwe,
Luanda,
21st
November
2017.
21
‘SADC
hails
smooth
transition’.
Herald
23/11/17.
22
‘SADC
Chair
Gives
ZDF
Thumbs
Up’.
Herald,
23/12/17.
23
International
Crisis
Group,
Zimbabwe’s
‘Military-‐assisted
Transition’
and
Prospects
for
Recovery.
Crisis
Group
Africa
Briefing
No.
134,
Johannesburg/Brussels,
20
December
2017,
p11.
7